Sledge-ge-hammer
I happened across an article in today’s Guardian online about Miley Cyrus’ new video for her single Wrecking Ball, which is apparently
rather sexual [well, it is because I watched it, as it was posted there,
ironically, in the article criticising her willingness to objectify herself as
a sexual object]. This is hot on the
heels of her sexed-up twerking performance at the recent VMAs, which I also saw
as a clip and thought was rather gormless.
Now, I should engage in the discussion about the
objectification of women which I do care about, though I would say that at 20 years
old Cyrus is perhaps allowed to decide for herself [she isn’t quite the child
that seems to be used as a contextualisation for her current allegedly aberrant
behaviour, rather it is actually being presented as something she used to be, which is an odd
argument], but I do recognise that her image is quite likely being orchestrated
by male music executives who aren’t particularly concerned about any issues
beyond earning.
But I’m not. I am instead simply going to complain about how
Miley Cyrus is yet another female singer adopting the fashion for an affected staccato
vocal that drives me crazy [mad, that is: people who regularly read here will know it is a pet hate]. It is in the way she sings wre-e-eck and then bre-e-ak in the chorus. It is such a popular aff-fec-ted piece of
stylistic nonsense, especially here in a pop song that is otherwise fine as far as pop
songs of this type go. I do acknowledge that the oral sex with a sledgehammer
will probably be remembered more than this repetition of an over-familiar stylised
regurgitation. That and the nudity.
"Gornmless": so-o-o-o apt. I prefer to hate the "growl" that Britney-alikes sometimes employ. This has evolved to the point where Kardashian/Britney types can have entire "conversations" without departing from this gravelly mode.
ReplyDelete